What Are the Differences Between the SOC 2 Report and SSAE 16?

What is the SSAE 16 report? What is SOC 2? What are the differences between the SOC 2 report and SSAE 16? Find out the answers in this article.

Being compliant is crucial for any business that handles sensitive data or provides outsourced services affecting the internal controls of its clients. While there are many frameworks that ensure robust protection of digital assets, two significant frameworks in this domain are SSAE 16 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16) and SOC (System and Organization Controls) 2. While both serve similar goals of accountability and assurance, they are not interchangeable. 

Understanding the nuances between them can help companies choose the one that best fits their needs, thereby safeguarding them from legal issues and enhancing their market credibility. This article explores SSAE vs SOC 2, highlights their differences, and guides you in making an informed decision on which one is more appropriate for your organizational requirements.

What Is SSAE 16? 

SSAE 16 is an auditing standard set by AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). It came into effect in June 2011, replacing the SAS 70 standard to provide a more powerful framework for reporting on ICFR (Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting). 

Who Needs It?

Firms that require SSAE 16 are generally those offering services that could affect the financial reporting of their clients. These may include data centers, payroll processors, medical claims processors, and loan servicing companies. When these service providers have access to or manage data that could affect their customers' financial statements, SSAE 16 becomes a necessity, not just a best practice.

Key Features 

SSAE 16 is rich in features designed to ensure that organizations maintain stringent internal controls, particularly related to fiscal reporting. Here are some key aspects:

Key Feature


Type 1 and Type 2 Reports

Type 1 statement focuses on control suitability and design at a specific time, while Type 2 evaluates operational effectiveness over a 6 to 12-month audit period.

Management Assertion

A written statement from the company's management confirming the accuracy of information and effective operation of safety measures during the audit period.

Detailed Control Objectives and Activities

Requires a comprehensive outline of control objectives and related activities, laying the groundwork for the audit and assuring clients of process effectiveness.

In-Depth Testing of Controls

Auditors perform detailed examinations to assess the operational effectiveness of controls, which can include system penetration tests and procedural walkthroughs.

User Control Considerations

Sections in the report advise clients on additional controls they should have in place, offering a holistic view of control effectiveness.

Auditor’s Opinion

A formal statement concluding the audit, indicating the reliability and effectiveness of the service organization’s controls, serving as external validation. 

Benefits of SSAE 16 

Below are some of the advantages of SSAE 16:

  • Financial Accuracy: Since SSAE 16 main focus is on rules related to financial reporting, compliant organizations can assure stakeholders about the accuracy of their financial data, which is critical for decision-making.
  • Third-Party Assurance: The inclusion of an auditor's opinion in the report offers third-party validation, instilling confidence among consumers and investors. The rigorous evaluation process attests to the reliability and effectiveness of the firm's internal safety measures.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Implementing this standard can help companies meet requirements set by other regulatory frameworks. For example, it's often a prerequisite for regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) in the United States.
  • Risk Mitigation: The audit preparation process forces a firm to critically assess its internal safety measures. This often leads to the identification and mitigation of potential risks, thereby improving operational robustness.
  • Competitive Advantage: In markets where clients and customers have to entrust sensitive monetary data to service organizations, SSAE 16 compliance helps in securing new contracts or retaining existing clients who require assurance of robust financial controls.

What Is SOC 2? 

SOC 2 is a compliance framework designed by AICPA to evaluate controls relevant to the safety, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy of a system. 

Who Needs It?

Organizations that store, process, or transmit sensitive customer data need SOC 2. This can include cloud computing providers, data analytics firms, and Software as a Service (SaaS) companies.

Key Features 

SOC 2 has several defining features designed to uphold high standards in system and data security. The table below highlights the key aspects to consider:

Key Feature


5 Trust Service Criteria (TSC)

Focuses on five distinct standards: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. These criteria form the audit's foundation and can be tailored to an organization's specific needs.

Type 1 and Type 2 Reports

Type 1 assesses the design and suitability of security rules at a specific point in time, while Type 2 assesses operational effectiveness over a predetermined audit period, usually 6 to 12 months.

Detailed System Description

Requires a comprehensive system description that includes services provided, types of data processed, and interactions between components. This ensures transparency and understanding of the company's controls.

Rigorous Control Testing

Involves an in-depth examination of controls, including activities such as vulnerability scans, code reviews, and manual inspection of procedures.

Auditor’s Opinion

Concludes with a third-party auditor's opinion, serving as external validation that the company meets the established criteria.

Ongoing Monitoring and Reassessment

Requires continuous compliance monitoring and periodic reassessment, unlike some frameworks that might consider a one-time audit sufficient.


Adaptable to organizations of various sizes and complexities, allowing for tailoring of the requirements to meet unique operational challenges.

Focus on Data Security

Given the increasing risks related to data breaches and cyber threats, its strong emphasis on data security makes it particularly relevant for organizations that handle personal customer data.

Understanding these key features can help organizations comply with the criteria and optimize their internal systems for a better SOC 2 readiness assessment.

Benefits of SOC 2 

Adopting SOC 2 offers a range of advantages that go beyond just ticking off a regulatory box. 

  • Enhanced Data Security: One of the most obvious benefits of SOC 2 is the improvement in information protection. The framework's stringent requirements around data protection measures ensure that weaknesses are identified and addressed, thereby greatly decreasing the risk of breaches and unauthorized data access.
  • Competitive Advantage: In today's market, data security is a major concern for customers. Being compliant can set you apart from competitors who do not have these certifications. Clients and customers often see SOC 2 as a trustworthy indicator that their information will be handled securely and responsibly, making it a valuable selling point.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Lots of industries are subject to laws that need proof of protected data handling practices. SOC 2 can aid in meeting these regulatory requirements, thus avoiding potential legal penalties or sanctions. Also, it serves as a comprehensive framework for being compliant with other regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA.
  • Operational Efficiency: The process of becoming compliant involves an in-depth review of an organization's control mechanisms, often revealing operational inefficiencies or areas for improvement. As a result, firms can streamline their operations for both effectiveness and safety, leading to better performance and potentially lower costs.
  • Stakeholder Confidence: Whether it's investors, board members, or third-party vendors, SOC 2 instills confidence among various stakeholders. Knowing that an organization has passed a rigorous, industry-standard audit for its data protection practices assures that it is committed to maintaining high levels of security and operational excellence.

SSAE 16 vs. SOC 2: Know the Differences

The table below provides a clear understanding of the key differences between SSAE 16 and SOC 2, aiding organizations in selecting the most appropriate framework for their specific needs. 




Aim and Coverage

Targets controls linked to financial reporting. Predominantly used in sectors such as banking.

Addresses multiple aspects such as safeguarding assets, ensuring uptime, maintaining data accuracy, protecting sensitive information, and preserving user privacy. Versatile for use in various industries.


Often obligatory for entities under financial governance like Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX).

Essential for any entity managing confidential client data, no matter the scale.

Kinds of Reports

Type 1 and Type 2 reports scrutinize the design and operational efficacy of financial controls.

Type 1 and Type 2 reports evaluate alignment with TSC.

Documentation Needs

Necessitates a managerial declaration that specifies control objectives and validates their function during the assessment phase.

Mandates an in-depth system overview, elaborating on services, data categories, and interrelations between system elements.

The choice between these frameworks depends on various factors, including the nature of the organization's operations, regulatory requirements, and the type of data managed.

When Can SSAE 16 and SOC 2 Be Used?

Both frameworks are not mutually exclusive and can be used in tandem for a comprehensive approach to compliance and governance. While they have their unique focus, they can complement each other well in specific scenarios. For instance, a financial services firm that is concerned with both the integrity of its reporting and the security of its customer data could benefit from using both. SSAE 16 would help ensure that the company's financial statements are accurate and reliable, and SOC 2 would provide assurance that customer data is secure, available, and confidential.

Similarly, technology companies that provide SaaS solutions could be subject to both financial audits and data security reviews. In such cases, SSAE 16 could be used to satisfy investors and stakeholders that financial controls are sound. At the same time, SOC 2 could prove to customers that their personal information is being handled securely and responsibly.

Healthcare organizations that store sensitive patient information could also benefit. Moreover, some regulatory frameworks or client contracts may actually require both types of audits. For example, a contract might stipulate that a service provider must be both SSAE 16 and SOC 2 compliant as part of the terms of engagement.

Tips for Choosing and Preparing for either SSAE 16 or SOC 2

Selecting the right compliance framework and preparing for the audit requires careful planning and consideration. Here are some best practices for making an informed choice and preparing for either SSAE 16 or SOC 2:

  • Evaluate Organizational Needs: Before deciding on a framework, clearly outline the objectives you're looking to achieve with the audit. If the focus is on financial reporting controls, SSAE 16 may be more appropriate. For broader security measures like data protection, SOC 2 is generally better suited.
  • Consult With Stakeholders: Engage relevant partners such as IT, compliance officers, and external auditors early in the decision-making process. Their insights can be invaluable in determining which framework will meet organizational needs and requirements.
  • Gap Analysis: Conduct a gap analysis to identify areas where your company might fall short of the required controls and processes. This will give you a roadmap for areas that need improvement before undergoing the audit.
  • Prepare Documentation: For SSAE 16, make sure the management assertion is well-drafted, clear, and comprehensive. For SOC 2, ensure that system descriptions are detailed and accurately reflect operational processes.
  • Test Internally: Before the external audit, perform internal tests to check the operational effectiveness of controls. This serves as a dry run and can reveal weaknesses that need addressing.
  • Plan Resources: Compliance audits can be resource-intensive. Ensure that you allocate sufficient personnel and budget for the process. This could include external consultants or tools that help streamline audit activities.
  • Engage With an Experienced Auditor: Choose an assessor who has experience with your industry and the particular compliance framework you are aiming for. Their insights can greatly aid in the preparation and actual audit processes.
  • Continual Monitoring: After achieving compliance, it's crucial to constantly monitor and update controls to meet changing regulations and business needs. Regular internal checks can help maintain compliance and prepare you for subsequent audits.

By adopting these best practices, organizations can significantly improve their readiness for an SSAE 16 or SOC 2 audit, ensuring a smoother process and more successful outcomes.

Eden Data Can Help You Achieve SSAE 16 and SOC 2 Compliance 

Ready to embark on your cybersecurity compliance journey? Why not let the experts help you navigate the way? At Eden Data, we build security, data protection, and compliance programs for startups and next-gen organizations that are just diving into digital security and don't know which framework to choose. 

Also, we make it easy for businesses to understand where they are at in their compliance journey, helping them create a strategic roadmap with personalized action plans. For companies that want to achieve SOC 2 compliance or SSAE 16, our cybersecurity whizz will provide advice on what assessors look for during an audit, paving the way for a seamless certification process. 

Why Choose Eden Data?

Selecting Eden Data is a decision anchored in foresight and excellence. Here are some more compelling rationales:

  • Expert Team: Gain access to a squad of specialists, including Big 4 professionals and former military experts, who bring a wealth of experience in safeguarding diverse businesses.
  • Cost-Effective: We deliver advanced, cost-effective services that reduce the time and expense of handling security and compliance while ensuring your technology is aligned with business objectives.
  • No Onboarding Fees: We value your business and show it by eliminating onboarding costs. Start your journey toward better cybersecurity without any initial financial burden.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee: Our confidence in delivering exceptional service is so high that we offer a satisfaction guarantee. We're committed to exceeding your expectations in every way.

So, are you ready to level up your security game? Start your journey with these three easy steps: 

  • Explore our services here.
  • Review our pricing plans here.
  • Reach out to us to kickstart your cybersecurity voyage here.


SSAE 16 and SOC 2 are both critical compliance frameworks designed to help organizations manage and safeguard their operational and financial processes. SSAE 16 is particularly suited for entities concerned with internal controls over financial reporting, while SOC 2 caters to businesses that handle sensitive customer data, focusing on principles like security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. 

The choice between them hinges on the specific needs and regulatory requirements of an organization. In some cases, both may be applicable, providing a comprehensive approach to governance and data management. Understanding and preparing for the right framework is essential for the integrity, security, and credibility of a business in today's digital landscape.

Our team is ready to answer any and all questions you may have.